

App Radar vs FoxData
Both figures below were read from each vendor’s own pricing page, August 21, 2026 for App Radar and August 21, 2026 for FoxData. We sell an App Store tool of our own and it is not in this table.
| Feature | App Radar | FoxData |
|---|---|---|
| Entry price | €690 a year on Essentials, up to €299 a month | Not published ASO, ad intelligence and API priced apart |
| Pricing model | Tiered by apps, keywords, competitors and seats | ASO, ad intelligence and API sold separately |
| Stores | App Store and Google Play | App Store and Google Play |
| Free option | 7-day trial, card required | Free trial and free ASO tools |
| API and agent access | Not advertised | API product |
| Delivery | Web app | Web app |
The short version
What the choice actually turns on.
Only the rows where these two genuinely differ. Everything they answer the same way is left out, because it cannot decide anything.
- 01
Scripting and AI access. App Radar: none. FoxData: api.
- 02
Price. App Radar publishes €690 a year on Essentials, up to €299 a month; FoxData publishes nothing and quotes on request.
In its favour
What App Radar does well.
- Review management with AI-assisted replies, which ASO Studio does not do at all.
- Google Play alongside the App Store.
- Team seats and shared workspaces on the higher plans.
- Apple Search Ads and Google Ads management, backed by SplitMetrics which owns them.
In its favour
What FoxData does well.
- Ad intelligence, which is a genuinely different product from keyword research and something ASO Studio does not attempt.
- A set of free ASO tools anyone can use, alongside the trial.
- Google Play as well as the App Store.
- An API product for teams that need to pull data into their own systems at volume.
Ours, for the record
There is a third option.
Both cover Google Play, which ASO Studio does not. If your app is iOS only, $59/yr a year covers unlimited apps and keywords on a native Mac app, and you can score your listing free first.
Keep comparing