Looking for an AppSprint alternative?
AppSprint is the other native Mac app for Apple ASO built by a small team, and it reads your subscription revenue from RevenueCat and Superwall, where ASO Studio reads yours straight from App Store Connect. Both apps can write supported metadata to App Store Connect; those subscription-platform integrations are a separate capability. It is $144 a year ($12 a month billed yearly) for unlimited apps, against ASO Studio's $59 a year.
| Feature | ASO StudioASO Studio | AppSprintAppSprint |
|---|---|---|
| Entry price | $59/yr | $144/yr |
| Pricing model | One flat plan | One yearly plan |
| Apps tracked | Unlimited | Unlimited |
| Stores | App Store, Google Play coming soon | App Store only |
| Storefronts | Every storefront Apple operates | 66 countries |
| Delivery | Native Mac app, macOS 15+, plus iPhone and iPad | Native Mac app, macOS 14.6+ |
| Licence | Follows your Apple account, any number of Macs | Single computer licence |
| Publishing metadata | Writes the fields and pushes them, after a diff | Editor writes to App Store Connect |
| Your own revenue | Sales, proceeds and subscriptions from App Store Connect | RevenueCat and Superwall integrations |
| Apple Search Ads | Optional connection, campaign management | Campaign management and return on ad spend |
| AI agent access | MCPBuilt-in MCP server | MCPAppSprint MCP server |
| Free option | Free toolsFree App Rating checker, no sign-up | NoneNot listed |
Give them their due
What AppSprint does well.
- A metadata editor that writes straight to App Store Connect, so the change you decide on ships from the same window instead of being copied into a browser.
- Your own money in the same app: RevenueCat and Superwall integrations, plus SDKs for iOS, Flutter and React Native.
- Price localization across its 66 countries, which is genuinely tedious to do by hand.
- Apple Ads return on ad spend reported against the campaigns it manages, not just keyword-level ad data.
- The same runs-on-your-Mac shape as ASO Studio, including an MCP server, so neither of us is asking you to move your research onto a web dashboard.
The other side of it
Why people pick ASO Studio.
- 01
One flat price, nothing metered
$59 a year covers unlimited apps and keywords, with no per-keyword tier and no seats.
- 02
It runs on your Mac
A native macOS app, so your research lives on your machine and any keys stay in the Keychain.
- 03
On your iPhone and iPad too
ASO Studio Connect Pro comes with it: App Review status, pushes, your numbers and your ranks, native on iPhone and iPad.
- 04
Nothing to set up
Works out of the box on public App Store data. No API keys, no developer account required.
- 05
Built for AI agents
One address connects Claude, Claude Code or anything that speaks MCP to your keywords, rankings and market.
- 06
Our own models, grounded in App Store data
Demand, competition and market size are modeled from search results, autocomplete, ratings, reviews and pricing.
- 07
Support from the person who builds it
One developer writes the app and answers the email. No ticket tiers, no queue.
AppSprint questions
What people ask.
How much does AppSprint cost?
One Pro plan at $144 a year, which works out at $12 a month, VAT included, for unlimited apps on a single computer licence. No free trial is listed. ASO Studio is $59 a year for unlimited apps and keywords, and the licence follows your Apple account rather than one machine.
What does AppSprint do that ASO Studio does not?
Two things worth naming. It reads revenue through RevenueCat and Superwall, and it handles price localization across the countries it covers. ASO Studio does neither, and charts your sales, proceeds and subscriptions straight from App Store Connect instead. Pushing metadata is not one of the differences: connect an App Store Connect API key and ASO Studio writes an approved title, subtitle and keyword field for you too, always after showing the field-by-field diff. What the two do differently there is the reasoning around the write. ASO Studio names the terms the rewrite puts at risk, each with a rank it actually read and the words the change drops, and it grades the release against a success criterion frozen when you approved it.
Do both have an MCP server?
Yes, and both run it on your own Mac rather than as a hosted service, so an agent can read your keyword data while the work stays on your machine. An MCP server is no longer rare in this market: Applyra, Sonar, AppDrift, Astro, ASO.dev, AppKittie, AppFollow, Appfigures and MobileAction all advertise one too. What differs is where the work runs and what the agent is allowed to do without asking, which the comparison table records tool by tool.
Which is better for tracking several apps?
Both track unlimited apps, so it comes down to price and machines. ASO Studio is $59 a year against AppSprint's $144, and its licence works on every Mac you sign in on, where AppSprint's covers a single computer.
Still deciding
Not sure AppSprint is even the right shortlist?
The picks page gives one straight answer, the situations that override it, and the published price for every tool on it. Or put AppSprint against any other tool directly.