AppKittie vs SplitMetrics Optimize · neither of them ours
AppKittie logoSplitMetrics Optimize logo

AppKittie vs SplitMetrics Optimize

Both figures below were read from each vendor’s own pricing page, September 5, 2026 for AppKittie and August 21, 2026 for SplitMetrics Optimize. We sell an App Store tool of our own and it is not in this table.

AppKittie vs SplitMetrics Optimize at a glance. Follow either name for the pricing page the figures came from.
FeatureAppKittieSplitMetrics Optimize
Entry price$588 a year billed yearly, or $79 a monthNot published contact sales for a custom plan
Pricing modelOne plan, 3 seats and 5,000 API credits includedCustom plan
StoresApp Store and Google PlayApp Store and Google Play
Free optionFree plan (10 app searches a day, no keyword tools)No
API and agent accessMCP server and REST API, metered by creditNot advertised
DeliveryWeb appWeb app

The short version

What the choice actually turns on.

Only the rows where these two genuinely differ. Everything they answer the same way is left out, because it cannot decide anything.

  1. 01

    Trying it. AppKittie: free plan. SplitMetrics Optimize: none. A permanent free plan and a trial that expires are not the same offer.

  2. 02

    Scripting and AI access. AppKittie: mcp. SplitMetrics Optimize: none.

  3. 03

    Price. AppKittie publishes $588 a year billed yearly, or $79 a month; SplitMetrics Optimize publishes nothing and quotes on request.

  4. 04

    Who each is built for. AppKittie sits in the mid-market tier and SplitMetrics Optimize in the enterprise tier, which usually matters more than any single feature.

In its favour

What AppKittie does well.

  • Ad creative intelligence no indie ASO tool carries: the live Meta and Apple Search Ads creatives an app is running, how long each has been live, and estimated spend broken down by country.
  • An organic video library across TikTok, Instagram and YouTube Shorts, with the creators posting them, which is a whole growth channel that keyword tools do not look at.
  • An onboarding and paywall library, so you can read the exact flow a paying app ships rather than guessing at it.
  • A database of over 4,500,000 apps across both stores that you can filter by revenue, downloads, growth and launch date, which is the right tool for choosing what to build before there is anything to optimize.
  • A documented REST API next to the MCP server, with credit costs published per endpoint, so a script on a server can read the same data an agent does.
  • Being on the web, so it works from any machine and any operating system rather than only a Mac.
AppKittie in full

In its favour

What SplitMetrics Optimize does well.

  • Real A/B testing of store listing creative, measured on live traffic. That is a capability, not a feature, and ASO Studio has nothing like it.
  • The infrastructure and traffic volume to make an experiment reach significance, which is the hard part of testing.
  • Google Play alongside the App Store.
  • A team platform with the support and onboarding an enterprise contract carries.
SplitMetrics Optimize in full

Ours, for the record

There is a third option.

Both cover Google Play, which ASO Studio does not. If your app is iOS only, $59/yr a year covers unlimited apps and keywords on a native Mac app, and you can score your listing free first.

Score your app free first

Keep comparing

Put either one against something else.