AppSprint vs Gummicube · neither of them ours
AppSprint logoGummicube logo

AppSprint vs Gummicube

Both figures below were read from each vendor’s own pricing page, September 9, 2026 for AppSprint and August 21, 2026 for Gummicube. We sell an App Store tool of our own and it is not in this table.

AppSprint vs Gummicube at a glance. Follow either name for the pricing page the figures came from.
FeatureAppSprintGummicube
Entry price€114 a year on Solo (1 app), Pro €234Not published agency engagement, quoted per client
Pricing modelTiered by number of appsManaged service with a data platform
StoresApple only, 66 countriesApp Store and Google Play
Free option3-day trialNo
API and agent accessAppSprint MCP serverNot advertised
DeliveryNative Mac appAgency plus web app

The short version

What the choice actually turns on.

Only the rows where these two genuinely differ. Everything they answer the same way is left out, because it cannot decide anything.

  1. 01

    Stores. Gummicube covers the App Store and Google Play; AppSprint is App Store only. If you ship on Android this decides it before price does.

  2. 02

    Trying it. AppSprint: trial. Gummicube: none. A permanent free plan and a trial that expires are not the same offer.

  3. 03

    Scripting and AI access. AppSprint: mcp. Gummicube: none.

  4. 04

    Where it runs. AppSprint: mac app. Gummicube: agency.

  5. 05

    Price. AppSprint publishes €114 a year on Solo (1 app), Pro €234; Gummicube publishes nothing and quotes on request.

  6. 06

    Who each is built for. AppSprint sits in the indie tier and Gummicube in the enterprise tier, which usually matters more than any single feature.

In its favour

What AppSprint does well.

  • A metadata editor that writes straight to App Store Connect, so the change you decide on ships from the same window instead of being copied into a browser.
  • Your own money in the same app: RevenueCat and Superwall integrations, plus SDKs for iOS, Flutter and React Native.
  • Price localization across its 66 countries, which is genuinely tedious to do by hand.
  • Apple Ads return on ad spend reported against the campaigns it manages, not just keyword-level ad data.
  • The same Apple-only, runs-on-your-Mac shape as ASO Studio, including an MCP server, so neither of us is asking you to move your research onto a web dashboard.
AppSprint in full

In its favour

What Gummicube does well.

  • They do the work. For a team with budget and no time, that is the entire value and no tool substitutes for it.
  • Years of category experience across many clients, which is judgement you cannot buy in software.
  • Google Play alongside the App Store, handled by the same team.
  • Creative and listing production as part of the engagement, not just the research behind it.
Gummicube in full

Ours, for the record

There is a third option.

If neither shape of bill fits, ASO Studio is $59/yr a year flat for unlimited apps and keywords, App Store only, with a free App Rating check that needs no account.

Score your app free first

Keep comparing

Put either one against something else.